← All work

Work by Uchenna, founder of Thresh & Winnow, at a previous agency, before Thresh & Winnow. Client anonymised under NDA. This case study exclusively describes work directly attributable to Uchenna.

Case study 02 · Outbound · Health tech advisory

24+ meetings in two months for a health tech growth advisory.

A firm of senior operators wanted early-stage health tech companies that needed their help. Uchenna defined that market precisely in Clay, then wrote to companies when growth was on their minds.

Client
Growth and business development advisory for early-stage health tech
Buyers
Health tech founders and their investors
Uchenna's role
Market definition, qualification in Clay, signal campaigns, copy

The problem

Crunchbase’s filters couldn’t separate a health tech product company from a services firm, or a young startup from one that had outgrown the need for advisors.

The advisors helped most where startups were too small for easy access to large hospital systems, and facing growth problems for the first time.

Right after a raise, growth is the only thing on a founder’s mind.

  • Products, not services
  • Founded in the last 5 years, unfunded
  • Or raised up to Series A in the last 3 years
  • Raised in the last 12 months

What Uchenna did

  1. 01

    Pulled a broad market from Crunchbase

    Wide filters, so no possible health tech company was missed.

  2. 02

    Qualified every company with Claygent

    Kept companies selling health tech products, not services, still operating, and either founded in the last five years without funding or within three years of a round no later than Series A.

  3. 03

    Ran a raise campaign to founders

    Companies that raised in the last 12 months got a congratulations, the firm’s record helping health tech startups scale, and case study results.

  4. 04

    Reversed it for investors

    The same angle to VCs with health tech portfolios: the raise, which companies the firm could help, and results with similar ones.

  5. 05

    Wrote the copy and ran the sends

    About 4,000 emails over two months across all campaigns.

The result

24+

meetings booked in two months

1 in 4

messages got a positive reply on the best campaign

~$240k

estimated pipeline

Best campaigns (200 to 500 leads each): 1 positive reply per 4 messages to founders, 1 per 6 to investors; other campaigns ran lower. Estimate: 24 meetings × $10k, the low end of the client’s five-figure deals ≈ $240k; at about 25% meeting-to-close ≈ $60k revenue.